The case for using VSCodium is perhaps weaker than that for avoiding Chromium, since if your goal is simply to avoid Microsoft's telemetry, you can follow the documentation for the official release. The terms of use for the VS Code marketplace restrict its use to Visual Studio products so the alternative is to use the Open VSX registry for "VS Code Compatible editors." There is also currently an issue with GitHub authentication the sort of thing you have to put up with if you go the independent route. This makes life easy for VSCodium (or one's own build) but there is a similar issue to ungoogled-chromium for extensions. VSCodium is just "a repository of scripts to automatically build Microsoft's vscode repository into freely-licensed binaries with a community-driven default configuration." It does not have to be a fork since Microsoft intentionally keeps its customisations separate so that you can exclude them by building from the source and scripts on GitHub. VSCodium is a build without Microsoft's telemetry or other customisations. Microsoft's Visual Studio Code is the most popular development tool, according to surveys, and some fret about its dominance. Similar reasoning applies to the VSCodium project, though the way it works is different.
![ungoogled chromium vs iridum ungoogled chromium vs iridum](https://blokt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/The-Best-Secure-Browsers-Featured.png)
![ungoogled chromium vs iridum ungoogled chromium vs iridum](https://cd.blokt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/The-Best-Secure-Browsers-Featured-696x390.png)
Off by default: Google services in ungoogled-chromium VSCodium Because these binaries are not necessarily reproducible, authenticity cannot be guaranteed In other words, there is always a non-zero probability that these binaries may have been tampered with."Īs you would expect, the Windows versions are not signed, leading to the usual warnings. The options for installing ungoogled-chromium are building it yourself, getting it from a repository, or downloading binaries from GitHub which, the developers warned, "are provided by anyone willing to build and submit them. It is a crude approach in places, with strategies like "Replace many web domains in the source code with non-existent alternatives ending in qjz9zk," but effective. For example, the default search provider is "no search," which leads to the initially jarring experience of typing in the search bar and getting no assistance with navigation. Ungoogled-chromium by contrast simply removes features, with options in some cases for re-enabling them in settings. The snag with Chromium Edge is that it replaces one giant corporation with another. Manifest v3 is controversial, but considering that users have plenty of blocking tools not using blocking lists, v3 is irrelevant here.Microsoft's list of services replaced or turned off in Chromium Edge Blocking tools (browser built-in or add-ons/extensions) are not going to be affected by v3, if they don't use blocking lists.
![ungoogled chromium vs iridum ungoogled chromium vs iridum](https://trashexpert.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ungoogled-chromium-300x300.jpg)
For example, this is the case of "blocking list", already proven as very inefficient (in terms of browser performance). The problem is not the tool (blocker) but the way of blocking stuff. However, v3 interferes with the blocking strategy, specially when hurts browser performance. Manifest v3 has nothing to do with the above mentioned blocking mechanism, you can block whatever you want with v3. Please, remember that "privacy" is not related just to targeted ads. Therefore, regardless the browser, if the user blocks something, then (unfortunately) that will make him more unique. Like firefox also relies on extensions which can create a bigger fingerprint.Īny mechanism (browser built-in or add-on/extension) based on blocking web stuff, fatally it'll increase entropy, which will facilitate tracking, making users more and more traceable.